Skip to content

AI consulting and AI software development · Chennai, India · serving India and the United States

Free NATIVE Audit

Shared services · IT and HR shared services

Improving first-contact routing in an internal service desk

Tickets were routed by keyword rules written four years earlier. Roughly a third were re-routed at least once, and re-routed tickets took three times as long to close.

Company shape
GCC, 2,000 to 5,000 seats
Timebox
7 weeks
Systems
Ticketing platform, Identity provider, Knowledge base

IllustrativeThis write-up is a composite drawn from work of this shape. It is labelled because presenting a composite as a single engagement would be a fabrication.

Before

The state we started from

Tickets were routed by keyword rules written four years earlier. Roughly a third were re-routed at least once, and re-routed tickets took three times as long to close.

The decision

What had to be decided first

The metric was re-routing rate rather than handling time, because re-routing was the observable cause of the delay. The service desk manager owned it. Validation was a four-week live comparison with the rules engine running in parallel.

Built

What was actually built

A classification service that proposes a queue and a priority with the evidence it used, applied automatically above a confidence threshold and sent to a human router below it.

What changed

Re-routing rate fell from 31% to 12%, and median time to correct owner fell from 4.1 hours to 1.3

Measurement window
Four weeks live, parallel comparison with the prior rules engine
Methodology
Counted from ticketing platform audit history. Only tickets in the same categories present in both periods are counted. Human router time below the threshold is included.

What did not work

Automated resolution of password and access requests was cut from scope. The identity boundary was undefined for two of the three affected systems, so the work was stopped rather than deployed with a gap.

Systems involved

  • Ticketing platform
  • Identity provider
  • Knowledge base

Next step

Have a workflow of this shape?

Bring the workflow and the number you would want to move. We will tell you whether it is a good first case, including when the answer is no.